GM Stock - General Motors CoFundamentals & Analysis

Motor Vehicles & Passenger Car Bodies

Overview General Motors Co. is a legacy automotive manufacturer that generates large, stable vehicle revenues while exhibiting strong cash-generation characteristics and conservative leverage on its balance sheet. Cash Generation & Balance Sheet The company’s cash-generation stands out: trailing twelve‑month operating cash flow reached $26.87B while trailing twelve‑month net income was $2.70B , so

General Motors Co

Motor Vehicles & Passenger Car Bodies
Stock Price
$87.04
+$4.40 (+5.32%)
Jul 27, 2026
Debt to Equity
26.6%
ROE
4.4%
PE Ratio
29.34
EPS (Diluted)
$2.77

General Motors Co (GM) Fundamental Analysis

Overview

General Motors Co. is a legacy automotive manufacturer that generates large, stable vehicle revenues while exhibiting strong cash-generation characteristics and conservative leverage on its balance sheet.

Cash Generation & Balance Sheet

The company’s cash-generation stands out: trailing twelve‑month operating cash flow reached $26.87B while trailing twelve‑month net income was $2.70B, so cash from operations substantially exceeds accounting earnings (Earnings Quality Analysis, Revenue & Net Income). Free cash flow margin is 12.44%, and the average cash conversion ratio is 3.8343, indicating consistent conversion of earnings into cash. Balance-sheet leverage is modest with debt-to-equity at 0.2658 and interest coverage about 15.11x, supporting manageable debt service and capital deployment (Strategic Capital Allocation).

Weaknesses & Profitability

Notable weaknesses include sharply weaker per-share profitability and earnings. Diluted EPS has fallen to $2.77 (split-adjusted), with 1-year diluted EPS growth at -55.11%, and recent quarterly net income swung to a loss of -$3.31B in 2025 Q4 while TTM net income is $2.70B (EPS Diluted & Revenue per Share, Revenue & Net Income). Return on equity has declined to 4.4% and ROE growth is negative (about -53.68%), reflecting compressed shareholder returns, and net profit margin has dropped to 1.5% with gross margin down to 14.0% as of 2025‑12‑31 (Return on Equity (ROE), Profit Margin Trends). Revenue-per-share momentum has also decelerated into negative year-over-year growth of -1.3% most recently (EPS Diluted & Revenue per Share).

Key Fundamentals & Monitoring Focus

Key fundamentals to watch going forward are quarterly revenue and net income trends and the persistence of operating cash flow versus net income (Revenue & Net Income, Earnings Quality Analysis); the trajectory of diluted EPS and revenue per share growth rates (EPS Diluted & Revenue per Share, Revenue & EPS Growth); margin trends, particularly gross and net margins (Profit Margin Trends); ROE and its trendline (Return on Equity (ROE)); how the company allocates its increasing cash flow between capex and financing outflows (Strategic Capital Allocation); and any further changes in valuation reflected in the trailing P/E (Price-to-Earnings (PE) Ratio Trend).

Revenue and Growth

Revenue Trend

Revenue & Net Income

The foundation of business quality and long-term value creation

Revenue & Net Income Growth

Revenue at General Motors Co. has been relatively stable across the past several quarters, moving from $44.02B in 2025 Q1 to $47.12B in Q2 and a peak of $48.59B in Q3 before dipping to $45.29B in Q4 2025. The series shows a return to the mid-to-high $40B range after a pronounced trough of $16.78B in 2020 Q2 during the pandemic period, with quarterly variation but no sustained trend of sharp secular growth in the most recent year.

Net Income Volatility

Net income shows stronger quarter-to-quarter volatility. General Motors Co. reported positive profits in the first three quarters of 2025 ($2.78B, $1.90B, $1.33B respectively) but swung to a loss of -$3.31B in 2025 Q4; a similar Q4 loss occurred in 2024 (-$2.96B), while prior quarters often posted multi-billion-dollar net income. The most recent quarterly revenue was $45.29B. The most recent quarterly net income was -$3.31B.

Why Growth Matters

Consistent revenue and earnings growth are the lifeblood of successful long-term investments. Companies that can grow their top line (revenue) and bottom line (net income) over many years demonstrate they have products or services customers value and are willing to pay for repeatedly.

Revenue Growth shows whether the company is expanding its market reach, gaining market share, or successfully launching new products.Net Income Growth demonstrates the company can convert that revenue into actual profits while managing costs effectively.

Look for steady, sustainable growth rather than erratic spikes. The best businesses compound earnings year after year, creating tremendous value for shareholders over time. Companies that can grow earnings faster than revenue are improving their profitability—a sign of operational excellence and competitive strength.

General Motors Co (GM) quarterly revenue and net income trend analysis showing historical financial performance over multiple years. Interactive chart displaying revenue growth, net income trends, and profitability patterns for GM stock with quarterly and annual data points.

EPS Diluted & Revenue per Share

Per-share earnings and revenue — the shareholder's view of growth

Why Per-Share Metrics Matter

Total revenue and net income can grow simply because a company issues more shares or makes acquisitions. Per-share metrics cut through that noise — they show how much value each single share of stock is generating, which is what actually matters to shareholders.

Revenue per Share (split-adjusted) tells you how much revenue the business generates for every share outstanding. Growing revenue per share means the company is either expanding the business or shrinking the share count — both shareholder-friendly signals.EPS Diluted (split-adjusted) captures bottom-line earnings per share after accounting for all dilutive instruments such as stock options and convertible debt.

The most powerful signal is when both lines rise together over many years. If revenue per share grows but EPS lags, margins are being squeezed. If EPS grows faster than revenue per share, the company is becoming more profitable — a hallmark of businesses with durable competitive advantages. Watch for share buybacks, which can mechanically lift EPS even if total earnings are flat.

General Motors Co (GM) EPS diluted and revenue per share trend showing historical per-share earnings and revenue performance over time.

Revenue & EPS Growth

Year-over-year growth rates for revenue and earnings per share

Reading the Growth Rate Chart

This chart converts the absolute per-share figures into year-over-year percentage changes, making it easy to see whether growth is accelerating, decelerating, or reverting to trend — regardless of the company's absolute size.

Revenue per Share Growth (1-year, split-adjusted) measures how quickly the top line is expanding on a per-share basis. Sustained positive growth signals that the company continues to win customers and grow its addressable market.EPS Diluted Growth (1-year, split-adjusted) measures how quickly earnings are compounding for each shareholder. When EPS growth consistently outpaces revenue growth, operating leverage and margin expansion are at work.

Look for consistency, not just magnitude. A company that reliably grows EPS 10–15% per year is far more valuable than one that alternates between 50% spikes and deep contractions. Negative EPS growth during a period of positive revenue growth is a red flag — costs are rising faster than sales. Quarters where both lines converge near zero or go negative deserve close scrutiny.

General Motors Co (GM) year-over-year revenue per share and EPS diluted growth rate trend analysis showing historical growth performance.

Revenue Analysis

Revenue Waterfall Analysis

How revenue converts to net income for the most recent annual period

General Motors Co (GM) revenue waterfall chart showing the breakdown from total revenue to net income. Displays cost of goods sold, operating expenses, selling and administrative costs, research and development expenses, tax expenses, and final net income for GM. Annual financial statement waterfall analysis showing profit margin components and expense structure.

Period Information

Report Type: Annual (10-K)

Period: Jan 2025 to Dec 2025

Revenue Sources

Revenue composition by disclosure category for the latest period

Revenue Streams

  • Design, manufacture, and sale of trucks, crossovers, and cars.
  • Manufacture and sale of automobile parts.
  • Provision of software-enabled services and subscriptions worldwide.
  • Provision of automotive financing services through General Motors Financial Company, Inc. (GM Financial).
  • Ownership of equity stakes in entities that develop, manufacture, and/or market vehicles in other countries (described as part of the company’s operations).

Customer Profile

  • General reference to customers worldwide for vehicles, parts, and services.
  • Customers in other countries, primarily in China, served through equity ownership stakes in local entities.

Geographic Reach

  • Worldwide operations.
  • Organized into segments identified as GM North America (GMNA) and GM International (GMI).
  • Equity ownership stakes concentrated in entities operating primarily in China.

Distribution & Sales Channels

  • Vehicles and parts are developed, manufactured, and marketed under company brands (Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, and GMC) and, through equity stakes in other-country entities, under additional brands (Baojun and Wuling).
  • Automotive financing services are provided through the GM Financial segment.

Recurring vs Transactional Revenue Characteristics

  • Software-enabled services and subscriptions are described as subscription offerings.
  • Design, manufacture, and sale of vehicles and automobile parts are described as product sales.

Key Dependencies or Concentration Risks

  • Operations include equity ownership stakes in entities that serve customers in other countries, noted as being primarily concentrated in China.
  • Recent corporate actions relating to Cruise: cessation of funding for Cruise robotaxi development, acquisition of noncontrolling interests in Cruise, winding down of Cruise robotaxi operations, and combining GM and Cruise autonomous technical efforts into the GMNA segment (as described in the filing).

Profitability

Profit Margins

Earnings Quality

Earnings Quality Analysis

Comparing reported earnings to actual cash generation

Earnings Quality Analysis — Net Income vs Operating Cash Flow (TTM)

Over the last year through the 2025-12-31 period, General Motors Co's trailing twelve-month operating cash flow rose steadily from $20.13B at 2024-12-31 to $26.87B at 2025-12-31, while trailing twelve-month net income declined from $6.01B to $2.70B over the same sequence of TTM readings. That divergence widened in the most recent quarters, with operating cash flow substantially exceeding net income by roughly $24.17B as of the latest TTM values.

Prior to this divergence, net income was notably higher (around $10–11B in late 2022 through mid-2024) while operating cash flow was in the high teens to low twenties billions; the primary inflection is the fall in net income beginning after mid-2024 alongside a rising operating cash flow through 2025. The most recent Net Income (TTM) was $2.70B and the most recent Operating Cash Flow (TTM) was $26.87B (period ending 2025-12-31).

The Earnings vs. Cash Flow Gap

Reported earnings (Net Income) doesn't always reflect actual cash generation. Companies use accrual accounting, which recognizes revenue when earned and expenses when incurred—not when cash actually changes hands. This creates timing differences and opportunities for accounting discretion that can mask underlying business health.

Net Income (the "earnings" number) can be influenced by non-cash items like depreciation, stock-based compensation, and changes in accounting estimates.Operating Cash Flow, however, shows the actual cash the business generates from its core operations—a harder number to manipulate.

What to Look For

  • Consistent Alignment: High-quality earnings show operating cash flow tracking closely with or exceeding net income over time. This indicates the company is actually collecting cash from its reported profits.
  • Warning Sign - Divergence: If net income consistently exceeds cash flow, the company may be reporting earnings that aren't translating to cash. This could indicate aggressive revenue recognition, growing receivables that may not be collected, or inventory building up.
  • Positive Sign - Cash Exceeds Earnings: When cash flow exceeds net income, it often reflects conservative accounting (like accelerated depreciation) or strong working capital management. This is generally a sign of high earnings quality.
  • Quarterly Volatility is Normal: Some variation is expected due to timing of collections, seasonal factors, and one-time items. Focus on the trend over multiple quarters rather than any single period.

Key Insight: Companies with durable competitive advantages typically show operating cash flow that meets or exceeds net income over time, demonstrating they convert accounting profits into actual cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested in the business.

Return on Equity

Return on Equity (ROE)

Measuring management's efficiency at generating profits from shareholder capital

Return on Equity (ROE) for General Motors Co

Return on equity for General Motors Co has declined steadily over the past year and a half. After a 15.6% ROE at 2024-09-30, the trailing twelve-month ROE fell to 9.5% at 2024-12-31 and continued lower through 2025, moving from 9.0% (2025-03-31) to 7.2% (2025-06-30), 4.6% (2025-09-30) and most recently 4.4% (2025-12-31). The most recent sequence of quarters therefore shows a clear downward trend and a materially lower level than a year earlier.

Over the longer history shown, ROE for General Motors Co has been volatile: there were multi-quarter peaks above 20% in 2015–2016 and again around mid-2021 (24.7% on 2021-06-30), as well as negative ROE readings in 2017–2018 (for example -15.8% on 2018-03-31). The most recent trailing twelve-month Return on Equity was 4.4%.

The Gold Standard of Profitability

Return on Equity (ROE) is a powerful measure of how effectively a company's management is using the money shareholders have invested. Calculated by dividing Net Income by Shareholders' Equity, it reveals how much profit is generated for every dollar of equity capital.

A consistently high ROE (typically above 15-20%) is often the signature of a "quality" business with a durable competitive advantage. It indicates that the company can generate high returns on its own capital, which it can then reinvest at these high rates to compound value over time.

What to Look For:

  • Consistency: Look for an ROE that is stable or rising over time. Erratic ROE can signal cyclicality or inconsistent management.
  • Quality vs. Leverage: While a high ROE is generally positive, it can sometimes be artificially inflated by high debt (leverage). Always cross-reference ROE with the company's Debt-to-Equity ratio to ensure the profitability is coming from operational excellence rather than excessive borrowing.
  • Comparison: ROE is most meaningful when compared against industry peers or the company's own historical average.
General Motors Co (GM) Return on Equity (ROE) historical trend analysis. Quarterly chart showing the company's return on equity over time, reflecting management's efficiency in using shareholder capital.

Capital Allocation & Cash Flow

Capital Strategy

Strategic Capital Allocation

How the company generates and deploys its cash

Strategic Capital Allocation — Cash Flow Allocation Trend (TTM)

Over the trailing twelve months, General Motors Co.’s operating cash flow has strengthened, rising from $23.04B as of 2025-03-31 to $26.87B by 2025-12-31, reflecting an upward trend through 2025 after mid-2024 levels around \$20–24B.

Investing cash flow has remained a consistent cash outflow but became less negative late in 2025: investing outflows peaked at \$-22.69B on 2025-06-30 and narrowed to \$-16.13B by 2025-12-31, following several quarters of large capital deployment.

Financing cash flow has moved from a small inflow in early 2025 ($1.09B on 2025-03-31) to progressively larger outflows, reaching \$-9.59B on 2025-12-31, indicating increased net use of cash in financing activities in the most recent quarters.

Most recent trailing twelve-month values:

  • Operating Cash Flow TTM: $26.87B
  • Investing Cash Flow TTM: \$-16.13B
  • Financing Cash Flow TTM: \$-9.59B

Understanding Company Strategy

Capital allocation refers to how management decides to spend and invest the company's cash. Analyzing the three primary categories of cash flow reveals a company's true operational strategy:

  • Operating Cash Flow: The engine of the business. This shows how much cash is generated from core operations. Sustainable businesses should ideally fund their growth and shareholder returns primarily from this source.
  • Investing Cash Flow: The future of the business. This includes spending on new equipment, R&D, and acquisitions. Consistent negative values are normal for growing companies as they reinvest in their future.
  • Financing Cash Flow: The funding of the business. This reflects capital raising (issuing stock or debt) versus returning capital to shareholders (dividends and buybacks) or repaying debt.

What to look for: Is the company bootstrapping (funding growth solely from operating cash)? Are they borrowing to fund aggressive expansion or dividends? Or are they capital raising by issuing new shares, potentially diluting your ownership? A healthy, mature company typically generates strong operating cash, moderately invests in growth, and returns the surplus to shareholders through financing activities.

General Motors Co (GM) cash flow allocation analysis. Quarterly chart displaying the three pillars of cash flow: net cash from operating activities, investing activities, and financing activities, providing insight into the company's capital allocation strategy.

Balance Sheet

Book Value per Share

Book Value per Share

Net assets attributable to each share — the accounting floor of intrinsic value

Why Book Value per Share Matters

Book value per share is the net worth of the company — total assets minus total liabilities — divided by shares outstanding (split-adjusted). It represents the theoretical liquidation value per share if every asset were sold and every liability repaid at balance-sheet carrying values. It is the accounting foundation upon which much of equity valuation is built.

A steadily rising book value per share is one of the most reliable signals of compounding wealth creation. It means the company is retaining earnings and building net worth faster than it is returning capital or eroding it. Warren Buffett famously tracked Berkshire Hathaway's book value per share for decades as his primary measure of intrinsic value growth.

Context is essential. Asset-heavy businesses (banks, manufacturers, utilities) should be judged by book value more directly than asset-light businesses (software, consumer brands), where intangible assets like intellectual property and customer loyalty may far exceed their balance-sheet carrying values. A company trading at a large premium to book value is not necessarily overvalued — it may simply possess competitive advantages that accounting rules do not capture. Conversely, a declining book value per share — especially over multiple years — is a serious warning sign of capital destruction.

General Motors Co (GM) book value per share trend showing historical net asset value per share over time, split-adjusted.

Debt to Equity

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

How much of the company is financed by debt versus shareholders' equity

Reading the Debt-to-Equity Ratio

The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio compares total financial debt to shareholders' equity. A ratio of 1.0 means the company has borrowed one dollar for every dollar of equity; a ratio of 2.0 means it has borrowed twice as much as it owns. Financial leverage amplifies both returns and risk: in good times, debt turbocharges equity returns; in bad times, it accelerates losses and can threaten solvency.

Trends matter more than a single number. A rising D/E ratio can mean the company is taking on debt to fund growth — potentially value-creating if returns exceed the cost of capital. But it can also mean equity is being eroded through losses or that the business is borrowing simply to sustain operations. A falling D/E ratio generally reflects strengthening financial health: earnings are being retained, debt maturities are being paid down, or both.

Industry norms vary enormously. Capital-intensive sectors (utilities, real estate, financials) routinely carry high D/E ratios that would be alarming in, say, a technology company. Always compare against sector peers. As a rough rule of thumb, a D/E above 2× in a cyclical business warrants careful scrutiny of interest coverage and refinancing risk.

General Motors Co (GM) debt-to-equity ratio trend showing the historical balance between financial leverage and shareholders' equity.

Current Ratio

Current Ratio

Short-term liquidity — can the company cover its near-term obligations?

Liquidity: Can the Business Pay Its Bills?

The current ratio is calculated as current assets divided by current liabilities. A ratio of 1.5 means the company has $1.50 of short-term assets — cash, receivables, inventory — for every $1.00 of obligations due within the next twelve months. It is the most direct measure of near-term financial resilience: can the business meet its obligations without needing to raise new capital or sell long-term assets at a discount?

A ratio above 1.0 is generally healthy, meaning current assets exceed current liabilities. A ratio consistently above 2.0 may indicate the company is holding excess cash or inventory that could be deployed more productively. A ratio below 1.0 is a warning sign — the company is relying on future cash generation or external financing to cover its near-term obligations, which is manageable in normal conditions but dangerous during a downturn.

Trends and context matter.A declining current ratio isn't always alarming — highly efficient businesses (e.g., large retailers with reliable daily cash flows) often run leaner balance sheets intentionally. Conversely, a rapidly rising current ratio can signal slowing sales causing inventory to build, or customers taking longer to pay. Always compare the trend against industry peers and cross-reference with the cash flow statement to assess whether the business is genuinely liquid or just holding non-cash current assets.

General Motors Co (GM) current ratio trend showing the ratio of current assets to current liabilities over time, a measure of short-term liquidity.

Valuation

PE Ratio

Price-to-Earnings (PE) Ratio Trend

How much the market is paying for each dollar of company earnings

Price-to-Earnings (PE) Ratio

General Motors Co's trailing P/E ratio has re-rated sharply over the past year. After a long run of low single-digit P/Es through 2023 and much of 2024 (generally in the 3—4x range), the ratio rose to 8.6x at 2024-12-31 and then accelerated through 2025 — 7.9x (2025-03-31), 10.0x (2025-06-30), 19.5x (2025-09-30) and 29.3x (2025-12-31). The most notable inflection points are the step up at the end of 2024 and the steep increases across the second half of 2025.

Over the full history shown, P/E for General Motors Co was predominantly in low single digits from 2012 through early 2024, with intermittent earlier spikes (for example, 14.5x on 2020-06-30 and 12.7x on 2017-09-30). The most recent trailing twelve-month P/E ratio was 29.3x.

Key Findings

Recent P/E Ratio: 29.3x trailing twelve months

  • Significant re-rating in late 2024 and throughout 2025
  • From low single digits to over 29x in a year
  • Includes historical spikes in 2017 and 2020

What Is the PE Ratio?

The Price-to-Earnings (PE) ratio is one of the most widely used valuation metrics in investing. It divides the current stock price by the company's earnings per share (EPS), revealing how much investors are willing to pay for each dollar of earnings. A high PE can signal that the market expects strong future growth, while a low PE may suggest undervaluation—or reflect genuine concerns about the company's prospects.

Context matters:PE ratios vary significantly across industries. High-growth technology companies routinely trade at PE ratios above 30x or 40x, while mature, low-growth sectors like utilities or financials often trade closer to 10–15x. Always compare a company's PE to its own history and its industry peers, not just an absolute number.

What to Look For:

  • Expanding PE (Re-rating):If the PE is rising while earnings are also growing, the market is assigning increasing confidence in the company's future. If PE rises while earnings stagnate, it may signal speculative excess.
  • Contracting PE (De-rating): A falling PE can indicate the market is losing confidence in growth prospects. If earnings grow but the PE shrinks, total returns may be muted.
  • Negative PE: When a company is loss-making, the PE ratio is negative or undefined. In these cases, investors typically use other metrics such as Price-to-Sales (P/S) or EV/EBITDA.
  • Spikes and Troughs: Sudden PE spikes often occur when earnings temporarily collapse (making the divisor small) rather than when the stock price surges. Context is key.

Key Insight:The PE ratio is a snapshot of market sentiment and expectations. Tracking it over time alongside earnings trends reveals whether the market's valuation has expanded or contracted—and whether that change is justified by fundamentals.

General Motors Co (GM) Price-to-Earnings (PE) ratio historical trend analysis. Quarterly chart showing how the market has valued the company's earnings over time.